ABSTRACT
In the Covid-19 global crisis, gender-based violence (GBV) has been reshaped and reconfigured, with increases in some places and decreases in others. During our exploration of the changes in GBV through trans/feminist collaborative reflexive storying, we noticed the fragmentary nature of our storied recollections, which both represented and heightened the emotions in the work. With an intention of distilling the words even further, we challenged ourselves, as transdisciplinary researchers, to create a collaborative renga poem, which we titled, "Silent Footsteps.” An ancient Japanese form, the renga is a series of short, linked verses. This article demonstrates that renga offers an accessible, collaborative poetic research method, not only for research teams but also for non-academic groups to connect with each other. It has the ability to convey deep emotion, with an authentic personal voice, while being confined to structure and rules. Along with creating two stanzas each turn in a round of emails, we all wrote a reflection to engage with the process that identifies this method of writing research as holistic and creative, able to further connect the authors, reflect on the new knowledge and meaning that this work has motivated. Based on these reflections, which are woven throughout and on the renga poem, which is presented in full at the end, we argue that (a) renga is a timely poetic form, (b) it enhances transdisciplinary collaboration, and (c) that it offers both resistance and catharsis.
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on Lynda Enos a certified professional ergonomist who has worked in various healthcare and occupational health settings. Topics include discussing her background and how she became interested in occupational health, preventing violence in healthcare settings, and her work for a nursing union.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Although AVFs are preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters(TCC) are increasingly being used as dialysis access in certain clinical situations such as in AVF failure or lack of suitable vessels for AVF creation or bridge to living donor transplant. Aim and objective of this study was to study the characteristics of the population having benefited from tunneled cuffed catheters, to identify the different indications as well as the complications secondary to tunneled cuffed catheters in hemodialysis patients and to determine the catheter and patient survival rate and the factors associated with complications and survival. Method(s): This was an retrospective Observational study done after institutional ethics committee approval. All data was captured using standard proforma. The data was tabulated using MS excel and all results projected in form of bar graphs, pie charts, histograms or tables. Kaplan- meier analysis was used for survival. All patients included in the study consented for the procedure as well as collection of data. 527 TCC placement were done in 498 patients by nephrologists without fluoroscopy in a percutaneous fashion between jan 2021 to march 2022. Minimum follow up was 12 months. 37 patients lost to follow up. Result(s): 316 (68.5%) were males and mean age was 48.3+/-12.6 years. Staggered tip MAHURKAR MaxidTM Covidien, was used in every patient. Most common native kidney disease was cresentic GN 176(38.1%). Most common Site of TCC was right internal jugular 88.9%(441/496), followed by left internal jugular 10.48%(52/496), femoral TCC done in 0.6%. Mean blood flow achieved was 311+/- 32ml/min. Most common indication of TCC placement was starting of HD after 1/2 temporary access- 162(32.66%), followed by awaiting Maturation of autogenous AVF 66 (13.3%) and awaiting living-related transplantation 54(10.88%). Total catheter related infective episodes (CRBSI) were 229 (1.07 episodes/1000catheter days),Exit site infection was in 57 cases (0.26 /1000 catheter days), Tunnel infection was in 51(0.19/1000 catheter days), Infective endocarditis was seen in 3 cases. Catheter loss due to CRBSI was 23 (12.16%). Most common organism was Enterococci (29.7%), followed by s.aureus (24.32%). Most common immediate complication was tunnel bleeding (5.9% ), followed by improper tip position 4.68%. Late complications due to TCC thrombosis/ fibrin sheath was 74(15.07%). Recanalisation with urokinase was successful in 36.84%. Central venous stenosis was in 26 cases. successful recanalisation after central venoplasty was 16/19 (84.21%). Mean catheter survival was 201.9 +/- 114.9 days (3day to 12 months). Catheter survival at the end of 3 months was 75.76%, at 6 months 63.4%, at 12months 32.17%. Patient survival at 6 months was 86.7%, at 12 months- 77.5%. Most common cause of death was unrelated to TCC - cardiovascular cause (77.6%). Direct TCC related death was in 5 cases. Most common cause of catheter drop out was patient death (33.03%), followed by maturation of AVF (22.82%), catheter thrombosis/fibrin sheath (22.2%). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): Though AVF is the best access, for late unplanned HD initiation in many CKD patients, TCC insertion becomes next best option. In access crisis patients, TCC may remain one feasible option for bridge to available live donor transplant. With strict asepsis protocol and technical aptitude TCC placement is safe with few side effects. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out with the aim of determining the opinions and digital literacy status of the students who are preparing for the music talent exams of the universities during the COVID-19 process. The research is in the survey model, which is one of the quantitative research methods and is limited to 300 students who took the music department and department aptitude exams of 21 different universities. The type of high school from which the relevant students graduated, the universities they applied to for special talent exams, their previous undergraduate education, their status of researching distance education opportunities, and digital literacy levels of the universities they applied for special talent exams were included in the scope of the study. Within the scope of the problem situation of the research, the effects of the duration of the pandemic on the ear training, instrument training, voice training, and psychological state of the students were investigated. According to the data obtained from the interview form applied to the students, the pandemic process gave the students extra time for ear training, instrument training, and voice training, but this extra time could not be properly evaluated because there was no educator guidance. It was concluded that students felt inadequate about digital literacy.
ABSTRACT
The term "COVID 19" refers to the corona virus disease that first appeared in 2019 and was discovered in Wuhan, China, in December of that same year. This was a pandemic viral sickness that severely damaged the biosphere as well as the lives of all living things. It had an impact on people on all levels of devastation, including their bodily, mental, and psychological health as well as their social, economic, cultural, educational, and political lives. It also had a detrimental impact regardless of one's age, gender, socioeconomic status, etc. Every group in the human population had been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the elderly, the young, the young at heart, and children. In this regard, the mental, physical, and psychological health of students was impaired by the impact of COVID-19, and the education of students was also negatively impacted. This research study aims to investigate the effects of online instructions on undergraduate students. Data were gathered using a primary approach, such as a questionnaire, and secondary data were also gathered from a variety of study-related sources, including articles, journals, books, census data, etc.. In light of the fact that online classes harm students' health, result in strengthen learners' departure from real biosphere, weaken learners' logical aptitude, and facilitate face-to-face interactive association, this study explains the detrimental effects of online education on undergraduate students. Copyright © 2023 Ubiquity Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Despite extensive use of online language learning during the pandemic of COVID, there is insufficient research on what factors influence students' foreign language achievements in online learning conditions. This article investigated the roles of language aptitude and online self-regulated learning in foreign language achievement in mainland China. 76 freshmen from two classes at a university in Jiangxi participated in this study. They were required to complete an aptitude test of MLAT and a questionnaire on online self-regulated learning. The results showed that: (1) The students' language aptitude is at a relatively low level, and their online self-regulated learning is at an intermediate level;(2) A positive correlation is detected between language aptitude, online self-regulated learning, and their English achievements (r=0.621 & 0.583 respectively);(3) Language aptitude alone (grammatical sensitivity and associative memory ability) accounts for 38.9% variance in English achievement. Language aptitude and online self-regulated learning contributed 52.4% of the variance to their English achievements. Overall, the findings of the study confirm the high predictive power of the MLAT and predictions of the Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis (LCDH) advocated by Sparks and colleagues. Pedagogical implications are also discussed. © 2022 European Knowledge Development (EUROKD). All right reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: In the Phase 3 POSEIDON study, 1L T+D+CT demonstrated statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS (OS HR 0.77;95% CI 0.65-0.92;p=0.0030;mFU 34.9 mo in censored pts) vs CT alone in pts with mNSCLC. D+CT showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS and a positive trend for OS improvement vs CT that did not reach significance (OS HR 0.86;95% CI 0.72-1.02;p=0.0758). Here we report an updated exploratory analysis of OS, and histology and mutational status subgroups, after a mFU of ~4 y. Method(s): Pts with EGFR/ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomised 1:1:1 to 1L D (until progression) +/- limited-course T (up to 5 doses) + platinum-based CT (up to 4 cycles);or CT (up to 6 cycles). Alpha-controlled endpoints were PFS and OS for D+CT vs CT and T+D+CT vs CT. Pt tumours were molecularly characterised via sequencing of tissue and/or ctDNA samples. Result(s): At an updated data cutoff (DCO) of 11 Mar 2022 (mFU 46.5 mo in censored pts), T+D+CT continued to show OS benefit vs CT (HR 0.75;95% CI 0.63-0.88) with an estimated 25.0% of pts alive at 3 y vs 13.6% (Table). D+CT continued to numerically improve OS vs CT (HR 0.84;95% CI 0.71-0.99;3 y OS 20.7%). Consistent with results at the earlier DCO, OS benefit appeared more pronounced with T+D+CT vs CT in pts with non-squamous (than squamous;data will be presented) histology. A trend for OS benefit with T+D+CT vs CT continued to be observed in non-squamous subgroups with mutations (m) in STK11 (Table), KEAP1 or KRAS (data will be presented). No new safety signals were identified based on collection of serious AEs during long-term FU. [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): The results of this exploratory analysis from POSEIDON, after mFU of ~4 y, demonstrate the durable long-term OS benefit of adding a limited course of T to D and 4 cycles of CT. These data support the use of this regimen as a 1L treatment option for pts with mNSCLC, including harder-to-treat mutational subgroups such as STK11m, KEAP1m or KRASm. Clinical trial identification: NCT03164616 (release date: 23 May 2017). Editorial acknowledgement: Medical writing support for the development of this , under the direction of the authors, was provided by James Holland, PhD, of Ashfield MedComms (Macclesfield, UK), an Inizio company, and was funded by AstraZeneca. Legal entity responsible for the study: AstraZeneca PLC. Funding(s): AstraZeneca. Disclosure: B.C. Cho: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: KANAPH Therapeutic Inc, Brigebio therapeutics, Cyrus therapeutics, Guardant Health, Oscotec Inc;Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Interpark Bio Convergence Corp., J INTS BIO;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: TheraCanVac Inc, Gencurix Inc, Bridgebio therapeutics, KANAPH Therapeutic Inc, Cyrus therapeutics, Interpark Bio Convergence Corp, J INTS BIO;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Champions Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD, AbbVie, Medpacto, GIInnovation, Eli Lilly, Blueprint medicines, Interpark Bio Convergence Corp;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Ono, Yuhan, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Takeda, MSD, Janssen, Medpacto, Blueprint medicines;Financial Interests, Personal, Other: DAAN Biotherapeutics. J.A. Alatorre Alexander: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Janssen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Janssen. S. Lucien Geater: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer;Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer. K. Sang-We: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim;Financial I terests, Personal, Research Grant: Yuhan;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Norvatis, Lilly, Takeda, Therapex, and Yuhan. M. Hussein: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, Biopahrama, BMS, Exelixis, Mirati Therapeutics, Cardinal Health, Coherus Biosciences, Athenex, Karyopharm Therapeutics, IntegraConnect, Oncocyte. C.T. Yang: Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Merck, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie, Hanso Pharma, Roche, Ono, BMS, Chugai. L.H. Araujo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Lillly, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, BMS, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, MSD, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Sanofi. H. Saito: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, ONO Pharmaceutical;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical ONO Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb. N. Reinmuth: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Other: Symphogen: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Z. Lai, H. Mann, X. Shi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. S. Peters: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Vaccibody, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Roche/Genentech, Regeneron, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PharmaMar, Pfizer, Novartis, Mirati, Merck Serono, MSD, Janssen, Incyte, Illumina, IQVIA, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilhead, Genzyme, Foundation Medicine, F-Star, Eli Lilly, Debiopharm, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint Medicines, Biocartis, Bio Invent, BeiGene, Bayer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Arcus, Amgen, AbbVie, iTheos, Novocure;Financial Interests, Institutional, In ited Speaker: Takeda, Sanofi, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Pfizer, PRIME, PER, Novartis, Medscape, MSD, Imedex, Illumina, Fishawack, Eli Lilly, Ecancer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, BMS, OncologyEducation, RMEI, Mirati;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Associate Editor Annals of Oncology: Elsevier;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, MERMAID-1: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, MERMAID-2, POSEIDON, MYSTIC: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial Steering committee CheckMate 743, CheckMate 73L, CheckMate 331 and 451: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, RELATIVITY 095: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, BGB-A317-A1217-301/AdvanTIG-301: BeiGene;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial Chair ZEAL-1: GSK;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial steering Committee PEARLS, MK-7684A: MSD;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial Steering Committee SAPPHIRE: Mirati;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, LAGOON: Pharma Mar;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, phase 1/2 trials: Phosplatin Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial Chair Skyscraper-01;chair ALEX;steering committee BFAST;steering committee BEAT-Meso;steering committee ImPower-030, IMforte: Roche/Genentech;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Phase 2 Inupadenant with chemo: iTeos;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, ESMO President 2020-2022: ESMO;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, Council Me ber & Scientific Committee Chair: ETOP/IBCSG Partners;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, Vice-President Lung Group: SAKK;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Involved in Swiss politics: Swiss Political Activities;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, President and Council Member: Ballet Bejart Lausanne Foundation;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, Involved in academic trials: ETOP / EORTC / SAKK;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: Association of Swiss Physicians FMH (CH), IASLC, ASCO, AACR;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, ESMO President: ESMO;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, Vice-President Lung Group: SAKK;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Vice -President: SAMO;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, Association of Swiss interns and residents: ASMAC/VSAO. E.B. Garon: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: ABL Bio, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dracen Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Natera, Novartis, Personalis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Shionogi, Xilio Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: ABL Bio, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dynavax Technologies, EMD Serono, Genentech, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Eli Lilly, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis. T.S.K. Mok: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma Co., Ltd., Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca (before 1/1/19), BeiGene, BI, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Daz Group, Fishawack Facilitate Ltd., InMed Medical Communication, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Jiahui Holdings Co. Limi, Novartis, OrigiMed Co. Ltd., P. Permanyer SL, PeerVoice, Physicians' Education Resource, Pfizer, PrIME Oncology, Research to Practice, RochePharmaceuticals/Diagnostics/Foundation One, Sanofi-Aventis, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co., Ltd., T;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie Inc., ACEA Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Berry Oncology, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Company, C4 Therapeutics, Inc, Covidien LP, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, D3 Bio Ltd., Hengrui Therapeutics Inc., HutchMed, Ignyta, Inc., Incyte Corporation, Inivata, IQVIA, Janssen, Lily, Loxo-Oncology Inc., Lunit, Inc., Mer k Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., MiRXES Group, Novartis, OrigiMed, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnolo;Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: AstraZeneca PLC, HutchMed;Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Full-Time);Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Aurora Tele-Oncology Ltd., HutchMed, Act Genomics-Sanomics Group, Loxo-oncology, Virtus Medical Group and Lunit USA, Inc;Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, G1 Therapeutics, MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SFJ, Takeda, XCovery;Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Lunit USA, Inc., ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group, Aurora;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent contractor: AbbVie Inc., ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma Co., Ltd., Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca (before 1/1/19), BeiGene, Berry Oncology, BI, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, C4 Therapeutics, Inc, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Daiichi Sa, Loxo-Oncology, Merck Serono, MSD, Mirati Therapeutics Inc., MoreHealth, Novartis, OrigiMed, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Qiming Development (HK) Ltd., Roche Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, SFJ Pharmaceutical Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd., Vert, Guardant Health, Hengrui Therapeutics Inc., HutchMed, Ignyta, Inc., Incyte Corporation, Inivata, IQVIA, Janssen, Lilly, Lunit USA, Inc., Loxo-Oncology, Lucence Health Inc., Medscape LLC/ WebMD, Merck Serono, MSD, Mirati Therapeutics Inc., MiRXES, MoreHea. M.L. Johnson: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie;Acerta;Adaptimmune;Amgen;Apexigen;Arcus B osciences;Array BioPharma;Artios Pharma;AstraZeneca;Atreca, BeiGene;BerGenBio;BioAtla;Boehringer Ingelheim, Calithera Biosciences;Checkpoint Therapeutics;Corvus Pharmaceuticals;Curis;CytomX, Daiichi Sanyo;Dracen Pharmaceuticals;Dynavax, Eli Lilly, Elicio Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Erasca, Exelixis, Fate Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Genocea Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Harpoon, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Hengrui Therapeutics, Hutchison MediPharma, IDEAYA Biosciences, IGM Biosciences, Immunocore, Incyte, Janssen, Jounce Therapeutics, Kadmon Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Lycera, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Merck, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, NeoImmuneTech, Neovia Oncology, Novartis, Numab Therapeutics, Nuvalent, OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PMV Pharmaceuticals, RasCal Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Relay Therapeutics, Revolution Medicines, Ribon Therapeutics, Rubius Therapeutics, Sanofi, Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals/Birdie Pharmaceuticals, Shattuck Labs, Silicon Therapeutics, Stem CentRx, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Tarveda, TCR2 Therapeutics, Tempest Therapeutics, Tizona Therapeutics, Tmunity Therapeutics, Turning Point Therapeutics, University of Michigan, Vyriad, WindMIL, Y-mAbs Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Axelia Oncology, Black Diamond, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera Biosciences, Checkpoint Therapeutics, CytomX Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, EcoR1, Editas Medicine, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Genocea Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gritstone Oncology, IDEAYA Biosciences, iTeos, Janssen, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncorus, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Revolution Medicines, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi, Turning Point Therapeutics, WindMIL. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Providing course recommendations has proven its importance, especially with the outbreak of COVID-19 and the resulting difficulties in the learning process. Although several works have proposed algorithms in this regard, to our knowledge, these algorithms did not consider the aptitudes of the student. These works used the previous grades of the student along with other features without considering the inherent student aptitudes, which would play a vital role in the final student grade, and in the long run, shaping the student future. This work proposes a novel course recommender based on student aptitudes. In order to provide recommendations, we propose a novel method to extract the inherent student aptitudes. These aptitudes are further enriched using a pre-trained deep learning model to include semantically correlated aptitudes. We adopt the use of nearest neighbor approach in the course recommender and consider the previous-ly extracted student aptitudes. Experimental work proves the efficiency of the proposed methods in terms of accuracy. © 2022 ICIC International.
ABSTRACT
Background: In first line (L1) for EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), osimertinib (osi) has been the preferred option since 2018. First generation anti-EGFR TKI (1G) alone followed by osi, or 1G + anti-angiogenic or 1G + chemotherapy are other options. We aimed to assess the subgroups of patients (pts) that do not benefit from 1G alone compared with osimertinib L1 in mEGFR aNSCLC. Methods: Retrospective international study including pts with mEGFR aNSCLC treated with either osi or the sequence of 1G followed by osi (seq group). Primary endpoint was the PFS of the global strategy (PFSglob) defined as the time between L1 start and progression after L2 treatment or death. Subgroups analyses included pts with high tumour burden (high-TM;> 3 metastatic sites and/or central nervous system (CNS) involvement), poor performance status (PS), and T790M negative (seq subgroup only). Results: A total of 235 pts were included: 104 in the seq group, 118 in the osi L1 group. 15 had T790M negative at PD after 1G, they received osi as a therapeutic test. From these pts, 222 had an exon19 or 21 EGFR mut, 13 had uncommon mEGFR. Mean age was 65 years, 64% were female, and 60% never smokers. Pts from the osi L1 group had poorer PS (23% vs 10%), higher rate of co-mutations (23% vs 19%) and more CNS involvement (47% vs 19%). After a median (m) follow up of 30.6 months in the exon 19 and 21 population, mPFSglob was 27.4 mo (23.0-31.0) and mPFS L1 was 15.5mo (13.7-18.4) Table. The sequence was associated with shorter PFS L1 compared with osi L1 particularly in high-TM (10.5 mo vs 17.1 mo, p<0.0001);PFS was numerically shorter in poor PS (≥2) population (11.0 mo vs 15.6 mo, p=0.1). [Formula presented] Conclusions: 1G TKI followed by osi seemed to be detrimental compared with os L1 for pts with high-TM or poor PS mEGFR aNSCLC. In this population, the intensification of L1 treatment with osimertinib or a combination of 1G with anti-angiogenic or chemotherapy could be the better option in the first-line setting. Updated results will be presented at the congress. Legal entity responsible for the study: Institut Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi, Amgen. N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Mirati, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer, Novartis, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Grunenthal, Takeda, Owkin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Local: Roche, Sivan, Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Officer, International Thymic malignancy interest group, president: ITMIG;Other, Other, Family member is an employee: AstraZeneca. M.T. Moran Bueno: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory role: Roche. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, EISAI, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. L. Mezquita: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, SEOM Beca Retorno 2019: BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, ESMO TR Research Fellowship 2019: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, COVID research Grant: Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Inivata, Stilla. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: The value of increased HER2 gene copy number (GCN) in NSCLC is unclear. In this study we defined its frequency and characterized a cohort of patients harboring it. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC enrolled in the Gustave Roussy MSN study (NCT02105168) between Oct. 2009 and Feb. 2016 were screened by FISH (positivity defined as HER2 GCN to centromeres ratio ≥ 2) and tested for other molecular alterations. Descriptive analyses of clinical-pathological data were performed, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: HER2 FISH tested positive in 22 of 250 screened patients (9%). Median age was 60 years (range 47-80), 68% (n=15) were male, 91% (n=20) were current or former tobacco smokers (median exposure 47 pack-year), 64% (n=14) had adenocarcinoma, 18% (n=4) squamous cell and 18% (n=4) large cell carcinoma. 91% (n=20) had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Stage IV with extra-thoracic involvement was the most common clinical presentation (64%, n=14). Overall, 95% of patients (n=21) had 1 or 2 metastatic sites at diagnosis (bone 32%, lung 27%, nodes 18%, liver 18%, brain 18%). In 9 patients (41%) 12 concurrent molecular alterations were detected: 5 KRAS mutation (3 G12C, 1 G12D, 1 G61H), 2 HER2 exon 20 insertion, 1 EGFR exon 19 deletion, 1 BRAF V600E mutation, 1 ALK rearrangement, 1 FGFR1 and 1 MET amplification. 18 patients received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with 33% (95% CI 16-56) objective response rate and 83% (95% CI 61-94) disease control rate. After a median follow-up of 28 months (95% CI 23-45), median PFS and OS were 5.9 (95% CI 3.4-11.0) and 15.3 (95% CI 10.3-NR) months, respectively. Median PFS was longer in patients with higher GCN. As further line of treatment, 5 patients received trastuzumab: 4 in combination with chemotherapy and 1 as monotherapy, with 1 stabilization of disease as best response. 3 patients received nivolumab (1 partial response and 1 stable disease) and 3 a targeted therapy (anti ALK, EGFR, BRAF). Conclusions: Increased HER2 GCN was found in 9% of patients with unresectable NSCLC, was not correlated to particular clinical characteristics, but frequently occurred with other molecular alterations. Its clinical actionability and the correlation with protein expression deserve further characterization. Clinical trial identification: NCT02105168. Legal entity responsible for the study: Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: M. Tagliamento: Other, Personal, Other, Travel grants: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Eli Lilly;Other, Personal, Writing Engagements, Honoraria as medical writer: Novartis, Amgen. E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Sanofi. E. Rouleau: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, Amgen, GSK;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Clovis, BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Data base: AstraZeneca. A. Bayle: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Principal/Sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials: AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, BeiGene, BicycleTx Ltd, Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, INCA, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, drug supplied: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MedImmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer, Roche. F. Barlesi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, Mirati, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Takeda;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Pierre Fabre, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. D. Planchard: Financial I terests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Celgene, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, priME Oncology, Peer CME, Samsung, AbbVie, Janssen;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Institutional financial interests: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, EISAI, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. L. Mezquita: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, SEOM Beca Retorno 2019: BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, ESMO TR Research Fellowship 2019: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, COVID research Grant: Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Inivata, Stilla. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: OSE2101 (Tedopi) is an anticancer vaccine that increased overall survival (OS) (HR 0.59, p=0.017) versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in the population of interest (PoI N=118) of patients with IO secondary resistance after sequential CT-IO (ESMO 2021 #47LBA). The Net Treatment Benefit (NTB) is an original method combining efficacy and safety endpoints to test the overall improvement in health outcome between 2 treatments (Buyse M. Stat Med 2010). NTB was assessed in the overall population (N=219) from whom OS improvement of OSE2101 (HR 0.86, p=0.35) was lower than in PoI. Methods: NTB was tested by comparing prioritized outcomes using Generalized Paired Wise Comparisons (GPC). The prioritized outcomes were OS, then time to worsening ECOG (threshold=2 months) followed by severe adverse events, progression free survival (shorter vs. longer than 2 months) and Quality of Life (threshold=5 points on Global Health Status of EORTC-QLQC30). Analysis was stratified using the 3 strata of the study (histology, best response to 1rst line, line of prior IO) and enrollment time (before vs during COVID-19). Sensitivity analyses used no stratification, different thresholds of clinical relevance and PoI. Results: In the primary analysis (1088 pairs), NTB was 19% and reached statistical significance in favor of OSE2101 (p=0.035). In unstratified analysis (11120 pairs), NTB was 11% (p=0.188). In the PoI (388 pairs), NTB was 22% (p stratified=0.074) and 28% (p=0.014) in unstratified analysis (3040 pairs). Although the primary analysis was statistically positive, results were not consistent in some sensitivity analyses due to the limited sample size and the impact of stratification factors. Conclusions: An overall improvement in health outcome was observed with OSE2101 in the overall population of advanced NSCLC after IO failure with a NTB of 19% over SoC. In PoI with IO secondary resistance after CT-IO, the NTB was 22%. Post-hoc analyses are ongoing intended to explain the variability of NTB and will be detailed. Clinical trial identification: EudraCT: 2015-003183-36;NCT02654587. Editorial acknowledgement: We thank Pierre Attali (Medical Expert, MD) for his support in the writing of the . Legal entity responsible for the study: Ose Immunotherapeutics. Funding: Ose Immunotherapeutics. Disclosure: M.E. Buyse: Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, Chief Scientific Officer: IDDI;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Board Member: CluePoints;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: IDDI, CluePoints. F. Montestruc: Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors, CEO of the Company: eXYSTAT SAS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Statistician Consultant: AbbVie, Biocodex, Geneuro, Gensight, Guerbet, Imcheck, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Takeda;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Statistician Consultant and Training: Institut Pasteur. J. Chiem: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: IDDI. V. Deltuvaite-Thomas: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: IDDI. S. Salvaggio: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Working as a statistician: International Drug Development Institute. M.R. Garcia Campelo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, Sanofi/Aventis, Janssen Oncology, Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, MSD Oncology, Pfizer. F. Cappuzzo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, PharmaMar, Mirati, Novocure, OSE, and MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, Mirati, PharmaMar, Novocure, OSE, Galecto and MS . S. Viteri Ramirez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Healthcare KGAA Germany, Bristol Myers Squibb S.A. U, Puma Biotechnology;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda Farmaceutica España SA, MSD de España SA, AstraZeneca Farmaceutica Spain, Roche Farma SA;Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Reddy Pharma Iberia SAU. W. Schuette: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Roche, MSD, Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, MSD, Novartis. A. Zer: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Steba, Oncohost;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Nixio;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS. S. Comis: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Ose Immunotherapeutics. B. Vasseur: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Ose Immunotherapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Actions: Ose Immunotherapeutics. R. Dziadziuszko: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Takeda, Regeneron, MSD, Bristol Myers-Squibb, PharmaMar, Bayer;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, Foundation Medicine;Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, Celon Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Brsitol Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Loxo;Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: BeiGene, Ardigen, Ose Immunotherapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Subinvestigator and ad hoc Consultant: PDC* line Pharma;Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche;Other, Travel: Roche, Bristol Myers-Squibb, AstraZeneca. G. Giaccone: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Karyopharm. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, EISAI, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. E. Felip: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Medical Trends, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Puma, Sanofi, Takeda, Merck Serono, Peptomyc, Regeneron, Syneos Health, F. Hoffmann-La Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dome, Peervoice, Pfizer, Springer, Touch Medical, Amgen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Medical Trends, Merck Serono;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent member: Grifols;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Clinical Trial: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, AstraZeneca AB, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Exelixis Inc, Merck KGAA, Janssen Cilag International NV, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Novartis Farmaceutica SA, Bayer Consumer Care AG, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Pfizer S.L.U., Amgen Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation (BMS), Mirati Therapeutics Inc;Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, President Elect (2021-2023): SEOM (Sociedad Espanola de Oncologia Medica);Non-Financial Interests, Member, Member of ESMO Nominating Committee and Compliance Committee: ESMO;Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Member of Board of Directors and the Executive Committee (2017-Sept 2021): IASLC (International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer);Non-Fina cial Interests, Member of Scientific Committee: ETOP (European Thoracic Oncology Platform). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB) is moving from metastatic to curative setting in different diseases including NSCLC. While for metastatic disease radiological endpoints are currently the standard surrogate marker of benefit from ICBs, based on RECIST or PERCIST criteria, in neoadjuvant setting they often underestimate the response and then pathological response (PR) criteria were developed to evaluate Major PR (MPR), defined as ≤10% viable tumor cells after neoadjuvant treatment, and PR, defined as less than 50% residual tumor cells. Anyway, a non-invasive approach to determine the response to treatment is still an unmet need. Methods: PRINCEPS was a phase 2 clinical trial including limited-stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC patients who received one administration of atezolizumab before surgery. 18-F FDG PET was performed within 28 days and after 15-22 days from atezolizumab. Surgery was performed at day 22-29 from atezolizumab. PET derived parameters including MTV and TLG was extracted by experienced nuclear physicians. Results: 30 patients were enrolled, all received A and underwent surgical resection after a median of 23 days. MPR was identified in 4, pPR in 8 tumors. Paired PET were available for 28 pts. Mean time from A to PET was 18 days (IQR 3.5). Total TLG and MTV reduction was not correlated with percentage of pPR (p=0.117 and p=0.843, respectively). Reduction of MTV (Pearson correlation 0.509, p=0.006) and TLG (Pearson correlation 0.562, p=0.002) in the primary tumor were strongly correlated with pPR, while no correlation was observed between percentage of pPR and variation in tumor diameters by RECIST criteria (-0.24, p=0.2) nor metabolic response (-0.12, p=0.55). The appearance of metabolically active hilar and mediastinal, non-pathological lymph nodes (LN) was noted in 12/28 patients, and specifically in. 2 out of 4 MPR and 5 out of 8 pPR. A trend toward an higher pPR was observed with LN appearance (mean 52% reduction in pts with LN appearance vs 29% without, p 0.061), probably reflecting immune activation. LN appearance was associated with hyperplasia and histiocytosis in resected, non-metastatic LNs. Conclusions: PET is able to early detect tumor response in localized NSCLC patients treated with ICBs in neoadjuvant setting. Clinical trial identification: NCT02994576. Legal entity responsible for the study: Institut Gustave Roussy. Funding: Roche. Disclosure: N. Chaput-Gras: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Strong-Iopredi Scientific Advisory Board: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Educational Session On Immune Cell Death: Servier;Financial Interests, Institutional, Expert Testimony, Expertise On Immune Cell Death Biomarkers: Servier;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Cytune Pharma;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant to identify immune biomarkers associated to clinical response in patients treated with agonistic mAbs: GSK;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Preclinical studies in mice: GSK;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Immune profiling of Head & Neck tumors: Sanofi. D. Planchard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Celgene, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, priME Oncology, Peer CME, Samsung, AbbVie, Janssen;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Institutional financial interests: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen. L. Mezquita: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, SEOM Beca Retorno 2019: BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, ESMO TR Research Fellowship 2019: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Resea ch Grant, COVID research Grant: Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Inivata, Stilla. J. Remon Masip: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Boehringer-Ingelheim;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Ose Immunotherapeutics;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, PI of PECATI trial in Thymic malignancies endorsed by a grant by MSD: MSD;Non-Financial Interests, Other, Co-PI of APPLE trial (EORTC-1525): AstraZeneca. F. Barlesi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, Mirati, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Takeda;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Pierre Fabre, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tele-prehabilitation is a behaviour change intervention that facilities the modification of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. Understanding patients' experiences of tele-prehabilitation provides important insights into service improvement. In this study, we aimed to describe our patients' perceptions of tele-prehabilitation and capture their capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to participate. This was a qualitative study to inform our service design and delivery. METHODS: Following purposive sampling, 22 qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with patients in the community that had completed tele-prehabilitation. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Deductive content analysis was used to map the identified themes against theoretical determinants of health behaviour change. RESULTS: We conducted 22 interviews. Our patients described their overall experience of tele-prehabilitation as positive and provided important insights that impacted their capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to engage with our service. Our team provided them the capabilities and self-efficacy to engage by personalising multimodal plans and setting goals. The remote delivery of our service was a recurring positive theme in providing flexibility and widening accessibility to participation. A missed opportunity was the potential for peer support through shared experiences with other patients. Patients showed greater motivation to participate for immediate perioperative benefit compared to long-term health gains. CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences and perspectives of tele-prehabilitation can be enhanced by incorporating the findings from this qualitative study into service redesign and delivery. We recommend: (1) applying holistic principles in care and goal-setting, (2) delivering a combination of home-based and in-centre programmes, and (3) engaging with patients at the start of their cancer journey when they are most motivated. In turn, this can result in more effective uptake, improve adherence to interventions, and greater satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite the occurrence of HER2 amplification/overexpression (HER2+) in ~3% to 5% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and up to ~10% of patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC, there are currently no FDA- or EMA-approved HER2-directed therapies for HER2+ mCRC. Patients with mCRC who progress on early lines of chemotherapy regimens receive limited clinical benefit from current standard-of-care treatments. Tucatinib is a highly selective, HER2-directed, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The MOUNTAINEER trial (NCT03043313) was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the investigational combination of tucatinib with trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ mCRC. Here we present results from the primary analysis of MOUNTAINEER. Methods: MOUNTAINEER is a multi-center, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial conducted in the US and Europe. Eligible patients had HER2+ (one or more local tests: 3+ immunohistochemistry, 2+ immunohistochemistry with amplification by in situ hybridization, or amplification by next‑generation sequencing of tumor tissue) and RAS wild-type mCRC with progression on or intolerance to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and an anti-VEGF antibody. Measurable disease and an ECOG performance status of 0–2 were required. Previous HER2-directed therapies were not permitted. The trial initially consisted of a single cohort (Cohort A) to be treated with tucatinib (300 mg PO BID) and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg IV then 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks). The trial was expanded to include patients randomised 4:3 to receive tucatinib + trastuzumab (Cohort B) or tucatinib monotherapy (Cohort C). The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in Cohorts A+B. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. Results: MOUNTAINEER enrolled 117 patients between 08Aug2017 and 22Sept2021. Data cutoff was 28Mar2022. The median age was 56.0 years (range, 24, 77), and baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. Eighty-six patients received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Cohorts A+B, and 30 patients received tucatinib monotherapy in Cohort C (total, 116). The overall median duration of follow-up was 16.3 months (IQR, 10.8, 28.2). In Cohorts A+B, the confirmed ORR by BICR was 38.1% (95% CI, 27.7, 49.3). The median DOR was 12.4 months (95% CI, 8.5, 20.5). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.2, 10.3), and the median OS was 24.1 months (95% CI, 20.3, 36.7). The most common adverse events (AEs) in Cohorts A+B were diarrhoea (64.0%), fatigue (44.2%), nausea (34.9%), and infusion-related reaction (20.9%);the most common AE of grade ≥3 was hypertension (7.0%). Adverse events leading to tucatinib discontinuation in Cohorts A+B occurred in 5.8% of patients and included alanine amino transferase increase (2.3%), COVID-19 pneumonia (1.2%), cholangitis (1.2%), and fatigue (1.2%). No deaths resulted from AEs. Conclusions: In patients with chemotherapy-refractory HER2+ mCRC, tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab was well tolerated with clinically meaningful antitumor activity including durable responses and a median overall survival of 2 years. Tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab has the potential to become a new standard of care for patients with HER2+ mCRC. Clinical trial identification: NCT03043313. Editorial acknowledgement: The authors thank Joseph Giaconia of MMS Holdings, Michigan, USA for providing medical writing support/editorial support, which was funded by Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines. Legal entity responsible for the study: Seagen Inc. Funding: Seagen Inc. Disclosures: J. Strickler: Advisory / Consultancy: Seagen, Bayer, Pfizer;Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Seagen. A. Cercek: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Merck, Seagen;Research grant / Funding (institution): Seagen, GSK, Rgenix. T. André: Honoraria (self : Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gritstone Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Haliodx, Kaleido Biosciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Servier, Merck & Co., Inc, Servier;Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas Pharma, BMS, Gritstone Oncology, Transgène, Roche/Ventana, Seagen, Merck & Co., Inc, Servier;Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS, Seagen, GSK;Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS, Merck & Co., Inc. K. Ng: Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics, Bicara Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline;Research grant / Funding (institution): Pharmavite, Evergrande Group, Janssen. E. Van Cutsem: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Array, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi, Halozyme, GSK, Helsinn, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen Research, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Mirati, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Sirtex, Terumo, Taiho, TRIGR, Zymeworks;Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, Servier. C. Wu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Seagen. A. Paulson: Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics. J. Hubbard: Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics. H. Lenz: Honoraria (self): BMS, Bayer, Roche;Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Merck, Roche;Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS, Bayer, Merck KG;Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Fulgent. M. Stecher: Full / Part-time employment: SeaGen. W. Feng: Full / Part-time employment: Seagen. T. Bekaii-Saab: Honoraria (self): Royalties: Uptodate;Advisory / Consultancy: Consulting (to institution): Ipsen, Arcus, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, Genentech, Incyte, Eisai and Merck., Consulting (to self): Stemline, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Daichii Sankyo, Natera, TreosBio, Celularity, Exact Science, Sobi, Beigene, Kanaph, Astra Zeneca, Deciphera, MJH Life Sciences, Aptitude Health, Illumina and Foundation Medicine, IDMC/DSMB: Fibrogen, Suzhou Kintor, Astra Zeneca, Exelixis, Merck/Eisai, PanCan and 1Globe;Research grant / Funding (institution): Agios, Arys, Arcus, Atreca, Boston Biomedical, Bayer, Eisai, Celgene, Lilly, Ipsen, Clovis, Seattle Genetics, Genentech, Novartis, Mirati, Merus, Abgenomics, Incyte, Pfizer, BMS.;Licensing / Royalties: WO/2018/183488: HUMAN PD1 PEPTIDE VACCINES AND USES THEREOF – Licensed to Imugene, WO/2019/055687: METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER CACHEXIA – Licensed to Recursion. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 and related restrictions presented numerous challenges to individuals, communities, and nutrition education programs. To better understand how nutrition education programs, like SNAP-Ed, might target eligible clients during COVID-19 by assessing interest in nutrition education by baseline behaviors. Low-income adults, ages 18+, in Virginia. A cross-sectional online survey using Qualtrics panels was conducted March-April 2020. Survey questions included socio-demographic information, questions about food resource management practices (i.e., menu planning, using grocery shopping list, cooking at home), physical activity levels, and access to nutritious foods within their community, based on current adult SNAP-Ed evaluation instruments used in Virginia. Descriptive statistics were computed for all survey questions. Chi-square statistics (set a priori at α=0.05) were employed to examine associations between interest in programs and current practices. There were a total of 1,408 survey respondents from across Virginia. Results showed that interest in education programs were significantly associated with: SNAP participation within the past 12 months;using a grocery shopping list;cooking the main meal at home;meal planning;and regular physical activity. The findings characterize individuals with interest in potential SNAP-Ed programs and can be used to help inform and tailor program recruitment and marketing. Additional research is warranted to examine modality and dosage of interested individuals, in addition to recruitment and retention rates of individuals referred to existing SNAP-Ed programs from a survey of this nature. USDA Virginia Cooperative Extension Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education, Virginia Department of Social Services-Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
ABSTRACT
In March 2020, TTUHSC opened a new 20,000sf Institute of Anatomical Sciences for human gross anatomy. When the COVID-19 pandemic struck and many schools shifted from in person to online teaching, we hypothesized that if safety measures were used, in person cadaveric anatomy could be safely taught without a decrease in student performance. To test this, we reduced onsite attendance to less than 25% of room capacity. Masks were required at all times and students were instructed to social distance. Six students were assigned per cadaver, but only two students dissected at a time. The other four students reviewed and completed dissections and/or reviewed in groups of two at other allotted times. Thus, students dissected only every third lab. Dissection and lab review attendance was mandatory and students were nearly 100% compliant. Teaching assistants recorded dissected prosections reviews, and these videos were uploaded to password protected course files for independent learning. Students were provided iPads in the laboratory and access to three software packages for use on and off site. All students had access to multiple formative quizzes and exams, and three new online practice practical exams were created. To help reduce testing anxiety, a pass/fail system replaced categorical grading. However, all written and practical exams were conducted on site and in person. At TTUHSC, we have developed an exam question database to track historical student performance including a 25-question optional pre-block practice exam used to assess incoming student anatomical aptitude. In 2020, 90% of incoming students (93% in 2019) took the pre-block exam and scored an average of 28% (24% in 2019). In 2020, despite vastly different content delivery approaches (>80% of lectures were on Zoom) and reduced in-person dissection requirements, students modestly outperformed their 2019 counterparts. Overall exam averages were 89% in 2020 compared to 87% in 2019. If a categorical system was in place, 66% of students would have earned Honors or High Pass in 2020 compared to 61% in 2019. Our formative assessments were highly predictive of summative exam performance, and students reported that they reduced exam stress. Furthermore, summative exam averages correlated strongly with NBME performance (p<0.0001, r =0.63). TTUHSC medical students estimated that a majority of their peers at other medical schools did not have any in person dissection in 2020. Our students ranked in person laboratory dissection as the most useful learning activity, 88% reported that our COVID-19 preparations were very good to outstanding, and 97% were satisfied with the quality of their anatomy education. We conclude that 1) When using appropriate precautions, in person cadaveric anatomy can be taught safely during a pandemic;2) cadaveric dissection is essential for mastery of anatomical concepts;and 3) coupling online learning modalities with rigorous formative assessments prevented a modest reduction in cadaveric dissection opportunities from negatively impacting student performance. 2.
ABSTRACT
The inevitable shift towards online learning due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a strong need to assess students using shorter exams whilst ensuring reliability. This study explores a data-centric approach that utilizes feature importance to select a discriminative subset of questions from the original exam. Furthermore, the discriminative question subset’s ability to approximate the students exam scores is evaluated by measuring the prediction accuracy and by quantifying the error interval of the prediction. The approach was evaluated using two real-world exam datasets of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) exams, which consist of student response data and the corresponding the exam scores. The evaluation was conducted against randomized question subsets of sizes 10, 20, 30 and 50. The results show that our method estimates the full scores more accurately than a baseline model in most question sizes while maintaining a reasonable error interval. The encouraging evidence found in this paper provides support for the strong potential of the on-going study to provide a data-centric approach for exam size reduction. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
ABSTRACT
Across various academic disciplines, the study of human sexuality has often erased or created deviants out of anyone who falls outside the norm. This includes queer sexuality and variant ability sexuality but is especially true for those who fall into both categories. This work seeks to shed light on the erasure and demonization of queer variant ability populations, contributing to the growing body of research on variant ability sexuality, queer communities, and medical needs for marginalized groups. We focus mainly on the COVID-19 pandemic and h ighlight the need for increased academic research, public attention, and medical support for this marginalized group. This paper pulls from feminist studies, disability studies, sociology, and more The authors' identities also inform it as a queer and chronically ill individual and a queer and mentally ill individual. Through this work, the authors highlight how this population has been erased from the impact that erasure has had during the pandemic and urge the reader to consider this group more carefully as they go about their work, activist, and social lives. Ultimately, many social processes uniquely harm queer variant ability populations, and those processes have been exacerbated by COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
text: Background/Introduction: Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is an uncommon MDS/MPN overlap syndrome that has historically been included under the umbrella of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) for clinical trial and treatment. As a result, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) such as decitabine or azacitidine have been the established standard of care for the treatment of CMML. The oral bioavailability of these agents has been limited due to rapid degradation by cytidine deaminase (CDA) in the gut and liver so treatment has required intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injections daily for 5-7 days every month (m) adding significant burden to older cancer patients due to daily time commitment and travel to treatment centers. In the context of pandemic SARS-CoV-2, parenteral therapy also increases contact with medical settings with increased infection risk. Oral decitabine 35 mg/cedazuridine 100 mg (ASTX727) is an oral fixed dose combination of decitabine and the CDA inhibitor cedazuridine that produced equivalent exposure (99%;90% CI 93% to 106%) to IV decitabine 20 mg/m 2 in a randomized cross-over study (Garcia-Manero et al, ASH 2019), and Median overall survival (mOS) for the entire study population in the ASCERTAIN study was approximately 32 months (Savona, 2021). Here, we present outcome data for this study for the enrolled subpopulation of patients with CMML. Methods: We used a randomized cross over design in which patients were randomized in the first 2 cycles 1:1 to either Sequence A: (decitabine 35 mg/ cedazuridine 100 mg in Cycle 1 followed by IV decitabine at 20 mg/m 2 in Cycle 2), or Sequence B: (IV decitabine in Cycle 1 followed by oral decitabine/cedazuridine in Cycle 2). We conducted an intra-patient comparison of decitabine PK (primary PK endpoint: decitabine AUC equivalence over 5 days of dosing). Cycles were repeated every 28 days (unless delays were needed). All patients received oral decitabine/cedazuridine in Cycles 3 and above until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were eligible per the FDA-approved label of IV decitabine (MDS patients by FAB classification including CMML, or MDS IPSS Intermediate-1, 2 or high-risk patients). Clinical endpoints were best response according to International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria, transfusion independence for at least 8 or 16 consecutive weeks, overall survival, and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.03. Results: Of the 133 patients enrolled and treated in ASCERTAIN, 16 (12%) had a diagnosis of CMML with demographics and as follows: median age 71.5 years, 69% Male/31% Female, median weight 87kg (range 65-124), 25% ECOG 0, 75% ECOG 1. Population disease characteristics were: 19% poor or intermediate risk cytogenetics, with median baseline hemoglobin 90 g/L, neutrophils 1.27 X 10 9/L, platelets 84 x 10 9/L, bone marrow blasts 5%, with 38% RBC transfusion dependent. Patients received a median of 7 cycles of therapy (range 3-24). Treatment-emergent adverse events of CTCAE Grade 3 or higher in > 10% of patients, independent of relationship to ASTX727, were cytopenias (neutropenia [69%], thrombocytopenia [63%], anemia [56%], leukopenia [19%]), febrile neutropenia (31%), fatigue (13%). Two patients (12.5%) had Complete Responses (CR), 8 (50%) had marrow CR ([mCR], including 3 (19%) with hematologic improvement (HI);Overall Response rate (ORR) [CR + PR+ mCR + HI] was 75%. Of six patients with baseline RBC transfusion dependence 3 (50%) became transfusion independent. Leukemia-free survival was 28.2 months and after a median follow up of more than 33 months, median overall survival had not been reached. Two patients (13%) went on to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT). Conclusions: In the overall study, oral decitabine/cedazuridine delivered equivalent PK exposure to 5 days of IV decitabine 20mg/m 2 with a resultant clinical activity safety and efficacy profile in CMML patients consistent with the published literature (e.g Zeidan, et a 2017) and the Phase 2 experience. The use of oral decitabine/cedazuridine is a reasonable approach in CMML patients. References: Garcia-Manero, et al ASH 2019 Savona, et al, Int. MDS Symposium, 2021 Zeidan, et al, Cancer 2017: 3754-3762. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Savona: Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;CTI: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;ALX Oncology: Research Funding;Astex: Research Funding;Incyte: Research Funding. McCloskey: Pfizer: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Incyte: Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy;COTA: Other: Equity Ownership;BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Griffiths: Boston Biomedical: Consultancy;Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria;Genentech: Research Funding;Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding;Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yee: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding;Geron: Research Funding;Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;F. Hoffmann La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;AbbVie: Honoraria;Janssen: Research Funding;Onconova: Research Funding;Genentech: Research Funding;Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;MedImmune: Research Funding;Jazz: Research Funding;Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Tolero: Research Funding;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Paladin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeidan: BeyondSpring: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding;BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding;Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees;Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding;Ionis: Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy;Epizyme: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding;Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees;Genentech: Consultancy;Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees;Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding;Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees;Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding;Astellas: Consultancy;Astex: Research Funding;Jazz: Consultancy;Jasper: Consu tancy;Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Agios: Consultancy;ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding;Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding. Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding;Astex: Other: Research support to institution. Patel: Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene-BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;PVI: Honoraria. Sabloff: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jaxx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dao: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Fazal: Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Taiho Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Odenike: Celgene, Incyte, AstraZeneca, Astex, NS Pharma, AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Oncotherapy, Agios, CTI/Baxalta, Aprea: Research Funding;AbbVie, Celgene, Impact Biomedicines, Novartis, Taiho Oncology, Takeda: Consultancy. Kantarjian: Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria;Astra Zeneca: Honoraria;Astellas Health: Honoraria;Aptitude Health: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding;Jazz: Research Funding;Immunogen: Research Funding;Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;Ascentage: Research Funding;Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding;AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding;KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria;NOVA Research: Honoraria;Precision Biosciences: Honoraria;Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. DeZern: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz: Janssen: Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy;Actinium: Consultancy;Agios: Consultancy;Amgen: Consultancy;Astex: Consultancy;Astellas: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Bayer: Consultancy;Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy;Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy;Helsinn: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy;Jazz: Consultancy;MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy;Mesoblast: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy;Otsuka: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Busque: Novartis: Consultancy. Leber: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, peakers Bureau;BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;TaiHo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hao: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Keer: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Azab: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Healthcare workers are very exposed to SARS-CoV-2, that’s causing a vulnerability issue for some of them. The presence of certain risk factors in these workers requires an assessment of the risk of exposure. Patients and methods: Our study is a cross-sectional descriptive survey by self-questionnaire posted on Google Forms from June 1st to July 31, 2021, intended for residents and interns at IR-UHC. Our objective is to assess the vulnerability and degree of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 through an appropriate risk level matrix. Results: 280 physicians responded, 36% were vulnerable, mainly asthma (39%), or on corticosteroid therapy (37%). 95% were at high risk of exposure. The level of risk was classified as critical among two-thirds of physicians, of which 67.7% were working shifts in Covid-19 units, 19% were working in a radiology department, 10% in an intensive care unit and 2% in a biology department;less than a third of the doctors presented an unacceptable level of risk of which 72.2% were on Covid-19 shifts, 7% were working in a radiology department and 2% in a biology department.The lack of availability of PPE was found in 64% of doctors. 65.4% of the doctors questioned were infected with Covid 19, of which 70.2% had moderate infection and 6.1% severe one. Conclusion: The high-risk level of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 among physicians requires the strengthening of preventive measures, and especially the involvement of occupational physicians in the decision of medical aptitude for the post of vulnerable staff.